Nordica 990 boots: red rear-entry monsters! Smashed the retention flange in an awkward landing; boot cuff could fold flat backwards!
Salomon 957 composite bindings: heel piece exploded into little bits while skiing bumps.
Volant Chubb Ti skis: broke off tip on one ski, delaminated whole of the other one.
K2 Apache Recon skis: Broke tip, pulled out rear binding. These were terrible skis.
Diamir Fritschi Freeride bindings: not so much a breakage as exposing a design flaw; never land a jump on a traverse: the toe retention is not good enough and the boot will twist out. A second problem is that the heel can release if a ski is flexed very hard, e.g. crossing a ditch; This flaw was fixed in later models.
Diamir Fritschi Freeride bindings: Sheared screw holding rear binding onto the main tube.
Rossignol Scratch BC skis: The first skis I got into “extreme carving” on. They couldn’t take it: I rotated the edges out of the ski structure on both skis.
Fischer RC4 FIS SL skis: rotated the edges out through the base.
Salomon 997 bindings: Barrel of toe piece split, provoking early release at higher DIN settings: cost me a broken thumb.
Volkl AC50 Unlimited skis: I loved these skis, but I rotated the edges out through the base.
Dynastar Cham 97 skis: rotated the edges out through the base (seeing a pattern here!)
My previous ski boots were 2012 Dalbello Il Moro Ts. I loved these boots, but they were a bit big, the liners were getting packed out with age, and they were too narrow across the forefoot. I also wanted something that I could use for touring.
After much research on hybrid boots, I was attracted by Salamon’s Quest range. I picked up a pair of 2016 Quest Pro 130s, Salomon’s top-of-the-range hybrid freeride boot, at the end of the 2015/2016 ski season, and first skied on them at the start of the 2016/2017 season, so they are just coming up for the end of their third season.
Hybrid boots are a compromise, but I wasn’t quite ready for how much of a compromise they were.
The shells are made of Salomon’s “Custom Shell” plastic that is thermoformable – I was keen to make use of this to make sufficient space for my wide feet. The liners are Salomon’s high-end “My Custom Fit Race” model, which are mostly thermoformable, though not quite in Intuition territory. The net result is a boot that can be thermoformed with the liners in, which is a recipe for a good fit. That said, I’ve still found that they are a little tight across the forefoot, despite having that area punched out to some extent when I first got them fitted. I got moulded foot beds from a sports doctor in Chamonix that specialises in boot fitting, and they have been great.
The boot has 3 clips, which are well designed, with long levers to help do them up tight, and a very chunky booster strap, which makes up for the lack of a fourth clip to some extent. The middle clip has two different mounting positions, and I found the rear one made for much better fit and heel retention.
The traditional overlap design means that they are pretty difficult to get on and off. This is partly a result of the thicker plastic which is needed to get the 130 flex rating, but makes it harder to pull them open enough. This is one things Dalbello’s “Cabrio” design is plainly better at, and a different planet to my old Salomon SX92s, which I could put on do up perfectly in under 3 sec!
One big win for these boots is the weight – at 1.4Kg each, they are very light for high-performance piste boots, though still relatively heavy for touring.
These boots have a very stiff 130 flex, which I’m fine with (I’m a very fast, aggressive skier), but they’re also very upright, and the two combined makes it difficult to get your weight forward far enough, and you have to fight the flex to bend the boot sufficiently; Maybe I just need to put on some weight! I found it difficult to get them tight enough to give full-on control without making my feet ache or go numb, but generally they were ok, though overall not a patch on my old Dalbellos. The upright stance also makes it harder to get low enough at very high speeds, resulting in your weight being too far back, which reduces control and can be quite scary! I think a softer flex, perhaps 110 or 120, would have worked better for me for this kind of boot as I like to have a lot of forward lean, but the upright stance is a fairly necessary part of the hybrid design compromise.
I’m not into ultra-lightweight or long-distance touring – I’m usually doing the up for the down, rather than to get somewhere, so weight isn’t a big concern, for either my skis or boots, but the light weight of these boots was a definite plus anyway. My touring skis are Wedze Samurais (178/99) with Tyrolia Adrenaline bindings. They are not bad – a bit flappy on the down, but ok on the up, great in soft snow, and the bindings are very solid and reliable (unlike my experiences with Diamir Fritschi Freerides, which I’ve broken 3 different ways). The boots have a walk mode, which is vital, and you can undo the top clip and strap to give maximum movement, and there’s an oversized pivot to keep the cuff laterally stiff while allowing easy fore & aft motion. The range of motion really isn’t quite enough though, and I found it resulted in quite an uncomfortable walking motion. When undone, the top clip sticks out and gets in the way of trouser legs. Despite the moulded liners and multiple precautions, I got terrible blisters on the sides of my heel on both feet – my first 2-hour outing was so bad that I ended up at the hospital needing antibiotics, and could barely walk, let alone ski, for a week! I have never had a pair of touring boots that didn’t give me blisters, so either I’ve always had the wrong boots, or my feet are weird. Overall I think I could live with the limited range of movement for tours of < 4 hours, but the blister thing was a showstopper. This has really prevented me from doing much touring at all, which is a shame as that’s 50% of the reason for having hybrid boots in the first place.
She canna take any more, Captain!
In the middle of the 2018-2019 season, I noticed that the right boot had developed a crack in the shell, right over the top of the foot in the overlap area.
This is at exactly the point where an overlap boot has the most stress, but there is no concession to that in the design, and the plastic tapers to a thin flange that is relatively easy to tear. Because this is an integral part of the lower “clog” part of the boot, this is fatal and there’s no way to repair it. Of course this happened outside the 2 year guarantee period. I contacted Salomon, who said “our boots have a 2 year guarantee”, into which read the subtext “…because they disintegrate after that”. As a result, the right boot has a noticeably softer backwards flex which directly affects on-piste performance, and it’s entirely possible that the boot could fail catastrophically at some point. The crack has progressed rather too far for preventative measures (such as drilling a hole to stop it spreading further) to help much, so these will have to head to the bin and I’ll need to shell out for some new boots for next season; I won’t be buying Salomons.
Something of a result yesterday. On the same run as on my previous attempt, I clocked 125km/h (that’s 78mph). Skis were Stöckli GS 166cm (i.e. short, not particularly stable) on fairly hard-packed piste. Given a better opportunity, run and equipment, it would be pretty straightforward to do better than that.
Today was an astounding powder day, just lots of bouncing about, really good fun on some nice fat Stöckli Stormrider XXL 178s. Tomorrow we have a guide booked and it’s due to be sunny – I can’t wait!
I was skiing in Engelberg with Fraser, Jamie and Paul last week. An excellent trip – we were so lucky with the conditions. Two weeks ago there wasn’t much snow at all, yet here we were at the end of the season with fresh powder, sunshine and an empty resort (aside from the zillions of Thai and Taiwanese Amway tourists!). I got a Garmin ForeTrex 201 wrist-mounted GPS not so long ago for the express purpose of seeing how fast I go when skiing. I’m happy to report that it works nicely. After several runs I’d only managed to get high 90s (Km/h). Several things make it hard to get high speeds: space, safety and skis. When you go fast it takes quite a bit of space, and it’s hard to find a run that combines a good enough gradient, smooth surface, good visibility an sufficient stopping space. Safety is hard too – other skiers, runs joining the intended route, obstacles, fences, blind corners etc When you go quick, someone with a 200m head start gets caught up very fast! Lastly skis – I’ve noticed for a while that modern carving skis are just not safe over about 40mph. The big sidecut that makes them so easy to turn also makes them very unstable in a straight line, giving rise to nasty speed-wobble shimmy. After I broke a binding (no more Tyrolias for me!) on the Stöckli Rotor carvers I was on, I switched to a pair of Stöckli “Snake” powder skis (as there was lots of powder to play in). Though these are not the ideal speed skis, they were a bit longer at 177cm, and the shallow 22m radius made them very much more stable. The fairly steep run below the Ice Flyer chair seemed a good candidate. The run-out is quite narrow with a twisty bit at the start, and the run was covered in lumps of soft snow, but there was nobody about. I managed 116Km/h (72mph), which I was quite pleased with.
Despite having been to Les Arcs about 6 times, the speed skiing run there is always closed, or at least unprepared, despite the tourist office going on about how anyone can have a go. I get the feeling that a flat, clear track with some big, straight skis could be pretty exciting!